Évreux, Portes de Normandie (FR)
The Synthetic Site Folder and Site Brief are available for free.
Please register and login to access the Complete Site Folder.
- Synthetic site folder EN | FR
- Site Brief EN | FR
- Site on Google Maps
- Back to map
Data
/ ©
Project Scales L/S - Urban and architectural
Location CA Evreux Portes de Normandie, City of Evreux - the Chartraine axis (rue Jean Jaurès, de la Harpe & Chartraine), from the train station to the university
Population CA Evreux Portes de Normandie 82,000 inhab., City Evreux 49,722 inhab.
Strategic site 180 ha – Project site 32 ha
Site proposed by / Actors involved CA Evreux Portes de Normandie, city of Évreux, with Normandie Region, Eure Départemental Council, SNCF Réseau (rail network) Chambre de Commerce et d’Industrie (CCI) Portes de Normandie, l’Etablissement Public Foncier (EPF) de Normandie, CAUE 27, and the University
Owner of the site CA Evreux Portes de Normandie, city of Évreux, SNCF Réseau, Eure Départemental Council
Post-competition phase studies of urban and architectural feasibility, guideline plan, and/or development project for public spaces
Team representative architect, uban planner, lanscaper
More Information
How can the site contribute to the productive city?
The station and its immediate surroundings constitute an urban system that juxtaposes the Madeleine district and the city centre, without any effective interaction. A genuine «frontier zone», uncrossable and even inhospitable, the station area has become an important space that rhythms daily life in the city while at the same time a public space suffering from a lack of definition. There is an opportunity on the property around the station to build a new urbanity that is not kept within its boundaries but deployed along a north-south axis connecting the Madeleine district to the city center. Redefine the botanical gardens, reintroduce «productive streets» along the commercial axis Chartraine-Harpe-Jaurès, create public space linking the station to the university and enhance access to the Madeleine. These objectives would develop urban connections along which other projects already under way could connect (e.g. Bel Ebat and St Louis) in order to further revitalisation and enhancement the city.
City strategy
Victim of deindustrialization, the city is seeking to regenerate economic development by capitalizing in on its know-how and heritage assets: heritage in the service of a territory-wide economic base and the economy in service of the enhancement of heritage. This involves the establishment in the heart of the city of productive activities (shops, services, diversified activities and uses, etc.) The city sees in the station area and its progressive multimodal status a social, cultural, economic and real estate opportunity to revitalise the city and its territory in interaction with the region and greater Paris, as well as a chance to link the upper and lower areas of the city (Madeleine and city centre) Between these two urban entities, the station and city centre, the city has grasped the importance of defining a strong fundamental public space, with productive and therefore attractive streets, through the re-appropriation of, for example, vacant commercial ground floors. This strategy also relies on the enhancement of the urban landscape heritage of which the botanical garden is a strong element.
Site definition
The station is located south of city centre on the Madeleine hillside. It dominates the lower city at the edge of the historic heart and impacts the other two hills that frame the city. The pedestrian bridge crossing the railway lines on a north-south axis is a fine thread in the heart of the area connecting the Madeleine neighbourhood (result of urban expansion begun in the 60s) and the historic city centre via the botanical gardens and Rue Jaurès, Rue Harpe and Rue Chartraine. Two major streets, Boulevard Churchill to the east and Boulevard des Cités Unies to the west, border the site. Boulevard Gambetta (the National road N13) crosses the site lengthwise. The station area, a major place in the heart of the city, should be able to produce urbanity at multiple levels, unlike the urban rupture that it currently causes.
How is Production Considered in the Urban Diversity Program?
Station sector: produce urbanity and think the adaptable city
The Evreux railway station is a centre of mobility and connection, a place for meeting and interaction. What spaces would be able to produce and accommodate urbanity capable of attracting users and local commuters on a daily basis? What facilities are needed to complement the existing infrastructure, enhance real-estate values, make the territory attractive and the whole city accessible by linking the upper and lower areas and connecting out even further? The challenge is also to imagine a relevant project for the present while being progressive and adaptable in the future (modernization project under study for the Paris-Normandy line). It is question of proposing in this context the structure of an urban diversity that avoids mono-functional programmes that could block the sector again and encumber its potential influence.
Heritage and economy: a productive interaction
As a continuation of issues involved in the development of the station area, the aim is to create links with the city centre to the north and Madeleine to the south, imagining an evolution of uses along shopping streets that have lost steam and to carry that progression on to the station.
How to introduce new activities, complementary and diverse, using both the influence of major transport infrastructures and their development potential, while relying on the fundamental urban, landscaped and cultural heritage of the city? How to rely on the inhabitants, the occasional or permanent visitors and especially training and educational activities? How to converge the numerous and wide-reaching interactions to be developed around the station with a creative regeneration born of the city’s heritage and the urban and territorial landscape?
Questions on the site
We would like to know if all the railways along the station are currently in use, and what is the amount of railways needed for a future functioning of the railway. Is it possible to reduce their number, and reuse this land for intensification strategies? Another related question - can we consider construction of a tunnel for railways?
The existing railway lines cannot be reduced because the SNCF need them for maintenance reasons and especially because as we don't know what will be the station's future regarding the LNPN project, it's impossible to figure out the capacity that will be needed. Regarding the construction of a tunnel for trains, within the framework of the competition, candidates will be free to come up with solutions in order to cover the tracks but it must be considered that digging a tunnel for the tracks is a really constraining solution, technically and most of all, financially.
Is it possible to have the following pictures without the yellow and red perimeters (etc.), to use it for project integration : FR-EVREUX-SS-AP01 / FR-EVREUX-SS-AP02 / FR-EVREUX-PS-AP02
These documents are available for download, in the Complete Site folder, in "0-New_Docs_after_Launch/aerial_pictures"
When and how to testify of us being architects?
For any question on the rules, please refer to the Rules page, on which you will also find an FAQ.
Please also check the Users's Guide for Participation to the competition for basic questions.
Could we have a dwg file with the topographic curves of the whole city ?
6 new dwg plans of the project sector were added to the complete site folder, in "0-New_Docs_after_Launch". However, the municipality provides no guarantee regarding the conformity of these documents.
This site is connected to the following theme
From Functionalist Infrastructures to Productive City How Can New Mobility Conditions Encourage Hybridization Between City & Production? Infrastructures are crucial actors to introduce a dynamic economy in the city. But they have most often been introduced against the city itself – motorways, parking lots, intermodal areas act as gaps and reinforce urban fragmentation.
How Can New Mobility Conditions Encourage Hybridization Between City & Production?
New city visions on a soft mobility model offer new opportunities to reconsider those infrastructures for adaptation. But how can we make sure this leads to a more sustainable urban life and the hybridisation of programs including productive activities? How to reinforce infrastructures as a fertile ground for a productive city? Could downgraded roads become productive streets? Could obsolete parking areas turn into productive places? Could updated intermodal nodes generate productive hubs? And which space strategies could arise from these scenarios?
Specific documents
Vidéo réalisée lors de la visite du site d'Evreux, le 31 mars 2017, en présence de : Guy Lefrand, Maire d'Evreux, Président d'Evreux Portes de Normandie Monsieur Hubert, Vice-Président à l'aménagement du territoire, climat et énergies et Président du CAUE de l'Eure Yves Grégoire, SNCF Gares & Connexions, Responsable Emergence et Montage des projets Normandie Ingrid Marcelpoil, Chef du service aménagement opérationnel et foncier, Evreux Portes de Normandie François Helleu, Directeur de l'aménagement du territoire, Evreux Portes de Normandie Katie Piedagniel, Chef du service aménagement urbain, Ville d'Evreux Agnès Cornil, Chef du projet de développement du cœur d'agglomération et des centres bourgs, Evreux Portes de Normandie Julien Brehier, Animateur Commerce, Evreux Normandie Tourisme Juliette Dessert, Chef de projet, architecte DPLG et Paysagiste, CAUE 27 / ©
Questions on the site
You have to be connected –and therefore registered– to be able to ask a question.
Fr. 2 June 2023
Deadline for submitting questions
Fr. 16 June 2023
Deadline for answers
Before submitting a question, make sure it does not already appear in the FAQ.
Please ask questions on sites in the Sites section.
Please ask questions on rules in the Rules section.
If your question does not receive any answer in 10 days, check the FAQ to make sure the answer does not appear under another label or email the secretariat concerned by the question (national secretariat for the sites, European secretariat for the rules).