Trondheim

The building named Dora I is around 22 meters tall (+ 24.5 meter above sea level). You should use this height as a maximum reference together with the guideline from the municipal master plan that says that the buildings at Strandveikaia should not exceed 5-7 floors.

The area of Strandveikaia is due for protection without many details. It is currently a political acceptance to consider the cultural heritage when developing the area. The Cultural Heritage Management Office shows openness towards how the buildings are to be preserved at Strandveikaia and states that the buildings are interesting structures for alterations, transformations and additions.

Interior and exterior images from the site visit is available in the folder 0-New_docs_after_launch with the following labels:

• Images from Strandveien 100: TRONDHEIM-NO-PS-P46 – P64
• Images from Strandveien 98b: TRONDHEIM-NO-PS-P65
• Images from Strandveien 98a: TRONDHEIM-NO-PS-P66 – P75
• Images from Strandveien 96a: TRONDHEIM-NO-PS-P76 – P92

Yes.

We recommend you to show how both scenarios can be implemented in your proposal since this issue is undecided.

The municipal master plan does not state an accurate number of dwellings planned for the Europan project site. It is up to each team it decide how many.

Drawings of the requested buildings are available in the folder 0-New_docs_after_launch.

• Drawing of Dora I: TRONDHEIM-NO-SS-M2-1.jpg.
• Drawings of Fyringsbunkeren (Skippergata 10): TRONDHIEM-NO-SS-M3-1 - M3-5.pdf.
• Plan of Dora II (Skippergata 16): TRONDHIEM-NO-SS-M4-1.pdf

The level of detail should underpin the concept of each project. The same goes for including housing. The Nyhavna area is planned as a new district of Trondheim with the Europan project site serving as a new local centre in this scenario.

Yes, participants are free to suggest design solutions for the quay.

OHG1 should go along Dora I as suggested on the map on page 11 in the competition brief. However, participants are asked to show the two scenarios for the road; its current location along Strandveien and rerouted south of the National Beer Centre.

The depth of the basin is sufficient for both sailboats and motorized boats. The design of the bridge will determine whether or not it's possible to access the basin south of OBR3 by boat.

There is not a great need for this function in the city of Trondheim at the moment, but there are no restrictions on proposing a marina or piers for recreational boats in the municipal master plan. The harbour authority and Trondheim municipality are looking for a creative use of the basin and welcome new ideas.

This is not asked for in the competition brief nor in the municipal plan.

There are no restrictions on this in the municipal master plan, but the Harbour Authority and the municipality of Trondheim aim at breaking down the barrier of Strandveien to improve the connection between the Europan site and the future National Beer centre.

The density of the site is subject to investigation by the participants. The municipal master plan does not state an exact number on this matter. It is important to note that the Europan project site will not be a profit-maximizing area.

The elevation lines of the site are located in a layer called H_YDEKURVE in the .dxf-file named TRONDHEIM-NO-SS-M1-2.

The document TRONDHIEM-NO-SS-M1-1 is the official illustration of the master plan for Nyhavna. The original files of the diagrams on page 10-11 in the competition brief are available in the folder 0-New_docs_after_launch named TRONDHIEM-NO-SS-M1-4.pdf.  The master plan indicates a mix of culture, commerce and housing, but competitors are at liberty to discuss programming freely.

25m2 outdoor area per child is the correct amount according to the regulations, but the participants of Europan are asked to look at the possibility to reduce this by exploring shared functions or alike. Who these other relevant users may be depends on the concept of the project.

The Development in Strandveikaia will define the standard for the larger Nyhavna area, and in that sense affect the strategy for further development of the study area. However, the participants work should primarily be made on the project site level. Participants are not asked to make a new master plan for the study area but to look at overall connections in the area and how the projects site is connected to its surroundings.

Please see map named TRONDHIEM-NO-SS-M1-5.pdf in 0-New_docs_after_launch  for the two possible routes that are to be considered.

The size (m2) of the parks should be as indicated in the master plan, but their dimensions / shape can be reassessed. The parks should be more or less located where they are indicated in the master plan but adjustments can be made in relation to this if argued for in the project proposal. 

This information is unfortunately not available.

The train track next to Dora I are currently in use. The activity will be phased out when the freight terminal is removed from Brattøra in the future.  The short, currently unconnected, track along Strandveien inside the project site is not in use and can be removed.

The parks should be more or less located where they are indicated in the master plan but adjustments can be made in relation to this if argued for in the project proposal. 

It is not compulsory to show both situations, but as this matter is not yet decided upon, it is recommended that the project proposals are robust enough to handle both possibilities.

The plans for the National Beer Centre are not made public, but the main entrance seems very likely to be the existing gate facing east.

Competitors should base the design on the guidelines given in the brief. Competitors are not expected to go into detail on the design of this function.